Another one for the weird science category

by Jennifer Lahl, CBC President

The UK has won permission to create an embryo with the genetic material from two mothers. You say, and why would they want to do this? It is to do research which seeks to prevent mothers from passing on genetic diseases to their unborn children. Of course this kind of research has ethical implications. First, here we go again with creating life for the sole purpose of destroying it. The embryo is human life, nascent human life, which some say is exempt from protection and others say is worthy of protection. Is human life a raw material/resource to be created and used for research? Second, we are intentionally creating diseased human life to conduct our research on. And finally, the concern grows over trying to create a ‘disease free’ population. Which genetic diseases are we trying not to pass on? Especially since many diseases have a genetic component to them, are not necessarily genetically linked? Is short stature (which is genetic) a disease? What about down’s syndrome? Baldness? Where will the ethical lines be drawn and who gets to decide?

Previous post:

Next post: